Comments on: Using Threeparttable package in LaTeX

By: rasremul

rasremul — Mon, 20 Dec 2010 22:29:51 +0000

“the sign \tnote{sign} has nothing to do with the sign \item[sign]. So it’ s not automatically like the real footnote. 2. for example: \item [1]blablabla but at last there will only be a “blablabla”, [1] is eaten by item. Unless you add a extra [] before [1]. But like what you write, \item[] \item[1] in this case [1] will also be eaten by item. Do you have any idea about this 2 problems? Thanks very much and looking forward to your reply.#3 Wang on 07.10.10 at 11:17 pm Well, I made a mistake that I put \end{threeparttable} before \begin{tablenotes}. Now everything is right. Thx.#4 Martin on 11.17.10 at 9:40 pm \end{threeparttable} is supposed to be at the end of the whole table. So the entire tablenote section comes first.” What I can not believe!

By: Martin

Martin — Wed, 17 Nov 2010 13:40:31 +0000

\end{threeparttable} is supposed to be at the end of the whole table. So the entire tablenote section comes first.

By: Wang

Wang — Sat, 10 Jul 2010 15:17:20 +0000

Well, I made a mistake that I put \end{threeparttable} before \begin{tablenotes}. Now everything is right. Thx.

By: Wang

Wang — Sat, 10 Jul 2010 15:13:29 +0000

Hallo, thx for the simple methode to add a footnote in the table, but there’s some problems: 1. the sign \tnote{sign} has nothing to do with the sign \item[sign]. So it’ s not automatically like the real footnote. 2. for example: \item [1]blablabla but at last there will only be a “blablabla”, [1] is eaten by item. Unless you add a extra [] before [1]. But like what you write, \item[] \item[1] in this case [1] will also be eaten by item. Do you have any idea about this 2 problems? Thanks very much and looking forward to your reply.

By: Mallik Rettiganti

Mallik Rettiganti — Sat, 24 Jan 2009 04:09:38 +0000

very helpful, thanks!